In Defense of Affirmative Action
[ send me this paper ]
A 6 page research paper which argues that affirmative action programs are still needed and useful for providing equal educational and employment opportunities to women and minorities. The writer states all of the major arguments against affirmative action, and then shows, through an historical and demographic context, why these arguments simply do not hold up as legitimate reasons for ending affirmative action. Bibliography contains 6 sources.
Filename: Defaff.wps

The Problem of Affirmative Action
[ send me this paper ]
A 5 page research paper arguing that affirmative action can and should be banned. Includes outline, and bibliography with 6 sources.
Filename: Affirm3.wps

LEGALIZATION OF DRUGS: A POSITION PAPER
[ send me this paper ]
This 4 page paper presents a logical arguement for the legalization of drugs, based on the writings of philosopher John Stuart Mill. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: MBardrg.rtf

Nixon’s Failed Attempt at Protecting the O Nixon's Failed Attempt at Protecting the Office of President
[ send me this paper ]
In his Second Watergate Speech of August 13, 1973, President Richard M. Nixon tries to defend his culpability in the Republican Party actions discovered at the Watergate hotel and resultant impending impeachment by way of arguing for protection of the Office of the President by preventing certain aspects of the investigation through use of his power as president of the United States. This argument fails by virtue of the fact that, being under investigation for illegal acts, he is not in a position of protecting that office and his speech does not succeed in regaining that authority, making it a non-viable defense for his personal involvement in the Watergate activity. 2 works cited. jvNixonm.rtf
Filename: jvNixonm.rtf

THE AENEID AS PROPOGANDA
[ send me this paper ]
This 3 page paper discusses the creation of the Aeneid as propoganda for the rule of Augustus. Textural evidence given. Bibliography lists 1 source.
Filename: MBaeneid.rtf

Drug Testing Should Be Mandatory For Certain Occupations
[ send me this paper ]
This 5 page paper argues that drug testing should be mandatory for airline pilots, school bus drivers, transit drivers, and heavy equipment operators. Supreme Court decisions on drug testing in general are discussed. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: SA229drg.rtf

EUTHANASIA: AN ARGUMENTATIVE PAPER
[ send me this paper ]
This 8 page paper argues that euthanasia should be legalized. Three issues/rationales are given and supported with quotes from various texts. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Filename: MBeuth.rtf

Fast Food, Microwaves and Society
[ send me this paper ]
This 3 page paper argues that fast food is a leading cause of obesity and that it’s generally not good for a steady diet. The paper also argues that microwaves change the properties of foods and should be used sparingly. While people will insist that fast-food provides employment and is handy, others argue that it’s junk. Bibliography lists 3 sources
Filename: HVfstfud.rtf

Why Affirmative Action Should Not Be Supported
[ send me this paper ]
This 6 page paper argues against affirmative action. The 2007 Imus controversy is included as an example of race relations in society. Affirmative action is defined and explored. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Filename: SA716AA.rtf

"Justices Restrict Right to Sue HMO: Parties Can't Allege Malpractice if Insurance Refuses to Pay for Care"
[ send me this paper ]
A 3 page review of this June 2004 article by Lisa Rapaport published in "The Bee". The author highlights the main points presented in the article and emphasizes that is useful not only in detailing the Supreme Court ruling but also in outlining the set of circumstances under which it occurred. It is just as useful, however, in the fact that it assesses what the ruling could mean to Americans.
Filename: PPhmoArt.rtf

"National Geographic": Political Propaganda or Insight into the Exotic and Fascinating?
[ send me this paper ]
A 6 page discussion of the criticism that has been waged by some authors against "National Geographic". Analyzing those criticisms and evaluating them against one specific article in particular this paper concludes that "National Geographic" is not a political publication and it is not intended to be. The publication's "images are formed, selected and controlled, purveyed and read" (as one author has contended) all right but they are presented for the specific purpose of giving us a view of the exotic and the interesting not the political and controversial. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: PPntlGeo.rtf

"People-Seeds": An Analogy In the Abortion Argument
[ send me this paper ]
A 6 page discussion of the concept of "person-seeds", a concept introduced by author Judith Jarvis Thomson in 1971. This paper outlines Thomson's analogy and uses it to delve deeper into the issue of the rights and wrongs of abortion. No additional sources are listed.
Filename: PPabrtSd.rtf

"Philosophy is irrelevant; all we need is technology"
[ send me this paper ]
This quote begins a 10 page paper that examines our reliance on technology and our value of philosophy. The discussion looks at the technocracy movement of the 30's, yet strikes a more moderate resolution than the quote suggests. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Filename: BBptech.doc.

(The) "English Only" Controversy
[ send me this paper ]
A 10 page comprehensive discussion of the 'English Only' controversy. Papers argues against English as our 'official' language and offers historical, socio-cultural, political, and linguistic rationale for this. Bibliography lists 10 sources.
Filename: Englisho.wps

A Comparison of Metropolitan Living to Residing in a Small Town
[ send me this paper ]
This 4 page paper provides a comparison of living in metropolitan areas and small towns. This paper is created in a subject-by-subject, compare and contrast style.
Filename: JHMetr.rtf

A Comparison of the Official Web Sites of the Democrats and the Republicans
[ send me this paper ]
A 4 page comparison of the web presence of these two political parties. This paper compares and contrasts the official web sites pointing out formatting and information differences. The author asserts that both parties pride themselves on providing information to the voting public but with just a brief review it becomes obvious that much of this information is really disinformation, information designed to cloud and confuse the facts. One party, however, is perhaps more guilty of this than is the other. No additional sources are listed.
Filename: PPpolPr2.rtf

Don't see what you need? CLICK HERE for customized research paper assistance instead!